In his whinge yesterday he read the previous blog to Rugnut about his attempts to secure a council or state government handout for his petrolhead hoon track. While complaining the sequence of events is wrong, apparently the facts are correct. He then claims he's going to lodge "defamation actions" against the bloggers responsible.
He might like to actually read the Australian laws in this area. Once he started appearing on the radio and other media pleading his case for public money, he's become fair game for criticism and analysis. In particular the law says to "Remember that just because a communication is insulting, annoying, false or damaging to someone’s business doesn’t meant that it is necessarily defamatory."
This is the kneejerk reaction by public figures like Roggenkamp when, for the first time, their idiotic views are challenged by other members of the public. That's what blogging is - it evens the playing field so that jerks with mates in the media get their idiotic ideas shot down by the public paying for this nonsense.
Hey Pete - opinions are like arseholes. Everybody has one. Thanks for voicing yours, readership has trebled overnight!.